This
films main purpose is to give a glimpse inside the past and present film critiquing
industry. It also lets the audience peek inside and see the interaction within
the industry. This film is not meant to inspire or encourage future film
critics. Many of the critics featured in the film say that they actually
planned on pursuing other writing professions before they became a critic. Many
of them do jokingly give advice to those who are contemplating this career by saying
“try everything else first”.
This film also offers
insight into what the future holds for the film critiquing industry. Some influential
people in the film critiquing industry offer their views on how the industry is
evolving and the role the internet is playing in this. They also discuss film
critiques in the form of a blog or website. In this portion of the film they
introduce some of today’s film critics that use the internet as their platform.
One thing that should
be noted about this film is that it is imperative to give it your full
attention, because it can be hard to follow. One minute it will be discussing the
past and then there will be an excerpt with a present day film critic and then
it will continue on with the past. Also, make a mental note of all the critic’s
names when they are first introduced because they are not reintroduced and you
could spend the rest of the film wondering who is who. This film does need a
little spice to keep the audience’s attention. I found myself growing bored and
restless but stuck it out because there was so much knowledge to obtain from
this film.
This film will educate
you about on a profession that is not often discussed. You will learn the ins
and outs of film critiquing from the actual critics themselves. It will also dispel
rumors that the film critiquing industry is depleting when it is actually just evolving.
Whether you are looking to make a career out of film critiquing or just enjoy
blogging about the latest flicks, this film is a must see for any opinionated
movie buff.
5 comments:
Agreed. The documentary wanders from one topic to another. The fact that the names of the critics were only shown once made it hard to identify who was who. Some good observations here.
Your review offers a true perspective of film critic history. Please use the critics names in your paragraphs so your reader may have a point of reference from the movie.
I really like your conclusion (even if I disagree with it!). I think it is very well written and ties what you're saying together nicely.
I agree that it was hard to follow at times. They could have tied it better in my opinion.
I agree too
Post a Comment